"No Means No" Update #1
“No Means No!”
“No Means No” Updates are designed to rebuke the Parent Updates the Rockford Area Schools send home in the children’s backpacks. Our tax money pays for these updates. When asked by someone who is against the Levy if they could also send information on why not to vote for the Levy, they were told no. The School District uses heavy weight colored paper to make sure to get our attention. Those who have more than one child in the school district receive more than one update. They are asked to distribute those updates to their neighbors.
“No Means No” Update #1
The first Parent update provides a timeline for the Levy. This is interesting because there is so little time between when the decision was made to have this MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT ELECTION and the election itself that it will be nearly impossible to reach everybody. The school district is doing a great job of reaching those folks who have children in the Rockford School District. Who is reaching out to the people without children in the school district? Those are the people who will vote against the Levy. Doesn’t it seem the School District has done this on purpose so that those people will not know about the special MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT ELECTION?
Here is the official Timeline:
Parent Update #1…………………………….………By January 7, 2005
Operating Levy Q&A Mailing………………………Mailed January 12-14, 2005
Parent Update #2…………………………………….By January 21, 2005
Notice of Special Election…………………………...Mailed January 14-31, 2004
Public Hearings………………………………………January 24, 2005
Ballots Mailed………………………………………..January 26, 2005-February 1, 2005
Parent Update #3……………………………………..By January 28, 2005
Parent Update #4……………………………………..By February 4, 2005
Election Day………………………………………….February 15, 2005
The Parent Update also provided the “Basic Levy Facts”…I will also share them here.
-The levy is for $597 per pupil unit
-Estimated Tax for a $200,000 home is $240 per year
-The duration of this levy is 5 years
-Will yield $1.1 Million dollars the first year
-The funding will be use to maintain class sizes and reduce future program cuts.
Just a couple notes here…
-This will equate for a more than 10% increase in the amount of taxes I pay. (I was told by someone in favor of the levy that I should have bought I smaller house).
-The Levy if only for 5 years. What will they do to make ends meet when 5 years is up, suddenly learn how to live with in their means or come back with their hand out again?
-I want to know what the program cuts are. And are their studies that show that kids do better in smaller classes, or do smaller classes just make it easier for the teachers. It this about the kids or the teachers?
